Introduction
Facing a sexual assault allegation can be an overwhelming and life-altering experience. Many individuals charged with sexual assault in Ontario find themselves navigating a legal system they know little about, often clouded by misconceptions and fear of the unknown.
At Shaffie Law, we specialize in defending individuals accused of intimate partner violence offences, including sexual assault. As trusted sexual assault lawyers in Toronto, we provide comprehensive legal representation tailored to the rich and varied needs of each case. Our firm has extensive experience handling these complex and sensitive matters. We understand the serious consequences of a conviction and are committed to providing skilled legal representation to protect our clients' rights.
The law of sexual assault in Canada is complex, evolving each day through both legislative changes and judicial decisions. This article is designed to provide future clients of the firm with a broad and reliable introduction to sexual assault charges in Ontario. Like our body of work on domestic assault charges, our goal is to help Ontarians understand the foundations of the law by drawing and simplifying from our extensive defence perspective.
We will address the basic legal elements of a "sexual assault", common misconceptions about the law, the potential consequences of a conviction and, lastly, general approaches to the defence. For those searching for guidance on what to do following an arrest for sexual assault, we hope this article serves
as a helpful starting point. If you've been charged, seeking legal advice promptly can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. Call our law firm today for advice.
What is a Sexual Assault Under Canadian Law?
Sexual assault is defined under Section 271 of the Criminal Code of Canada as any intentional, non-consensual sexual contact. It does not require physical injury—any unwanted sexual activity, including touching, can qualify as sexual assault.
The Criminal Code also includes other categories of sexual offenses, distinguished based on the circumstances and severity of the alleged conduct. These include:
Sexual interference under Section 151 (typically involving minors)
Sexual exploitation under Section 153 (often where there is a relationship of trust or authority)
Sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party, or causing bodily harm under Section 272
Aggravated sexual assault under Section 273, which requires proof that the complainant was wounded, maimed, disfigured, or had their life endangered during the commission of the assault
Sexual Assault Under Section 271
Sexual assault, under Section 271 of the Criminal Code of Canada, is by far the most commonly laid charge in this category. It encompasses a broad spectrum of non-consensual sexual activity and can arise in a wide range of contexts. These include allegations between strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners—including spouses, dating partners, and same-sex partners.
A persistent misconception is that sexual assault cannot occur within a marriage or long-term relationship; this is not the case. Canadian law makes clear that consent must be present in every sexual interaction, regardless of the nature or history of the relationship.
While many people assume that forensic or medical evidence is required to prove that a sexual assault occurred, that is not the case under Canadian law. Given the nature of the allegation, sexual assaults almost always occur in private, without witnesses and without any physical injuries.
Because the definition of sexual assault is intentionally broad, Section 271 functions as a kind of umbrella charge. It can include conduct ranging from unwanted kissing and touching to groping, digital penetration, or sexual intercourse without consent. The flexibility of the provision reflects the wide range of scenarios in which these allegations can arise. It also makes it essential to understand the legal principles that guide how such allegations are assessed by the courts and defended by experienced trial lawyers.
Potential Sentences for Sexual Assault Convictions
Sexual assault convictions carry significant penalties that vary based on the circumstances of the case. Under Section 271, sexual assault is a hybrid offence, meaning the Crown can elect to proceed by summary conviction or indictment:
Summary conviction: maximum penalty of 18 months; or
Indictment: maximum penalty 10 years imprisonment
These penalties are increased where the victim is under the age of 16 years. Similarly, more serious sexual assault charges under Sections 272 and 273 carry maximum penalties of 14 years and life imprisonment, respectively.
Unlike sentencing in domestic assault cases, the majority of convictions for sexual assault do result in actual jail sentences, even for first offenders.. All sexual assault convictions require sex offender registration and can result in significant restrictions on employment, travel, and housing opportunities.
Key Elements of the Offence of Sexual Assault
To secure a conviction for sexual assault under Section 271, the prosecution must prove certain essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. These elements are not only central to the charge but also form the basis for an effective defence. Understanding what the Crown must establish can help accused individuals and their counsel assess the strength of the case and develop an informed legal strategy.
Key elements of the offence of sexual assault include:
Sexual touching – The prosecution must first prove that the accused intentionally applied force of a sexual nature to the victim. This includes any form of physical contact including touching, kissing, groping, or more invasive forms of sexual contact.
Absence of consent – The Crown must then prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the complainant did not consent to the sexual activity. In Canadian law consent is determined from the complainant's point of view. This means the court will focus on the complainant's internal state of mind at the time of the alleged contact.
Intention and Knowledge – These elements refer to two separate aspects of the accused's state of mind. First, the Crown must prove that the accused intentionally engaged in the physical act in question—that is, the sexual touching was deliberate, not accidental.
Second, and more importantly, the Crown must establish the accused knew—or ought to have known—that the complainant was not consenting. This could include proof either that the the accused knew the complainant was not consenting, or that they were reckless or wilfully blind to that fact in the circumstances.
Understanding the distinctions between different types of sexual offenses is essential, as each carries its own set of legal standards, evidentiary burdens, and sentencing considerations. In the context of a Section 271 prosecution, much of the case will often turn on credibility—whether the court believes the complainant's version of events beyond a reasonable doubt. This underscores the importance of preparation, legal strategy, and the support of an experienced law firm specializing in Ontario sexual assault cases.
Common Misconceptions About Sexual Assault Charges in Ontario
Despite the seriousness and prevalence of sexual assault charges in Ontario, a number of persistent misconceptions continue to shape how the public—and at times, even accused individuals—understand them. These misconceptions can lead to dangerous assumptions and may affect how someone responds to an allegation, often with disastrous effects.
"If there's no physical evidence, the case can't go forward."
While many people assume that forensic or medical evidence is required to prove that a sexual assault occurred, that is not the case under Canadian law. Given the nature of the allegation, sexual assaults almost always occur in private, without witnesses and without any physical injuries. Where police were once reluctant to lay charges in the absence of such evidence, social and cultural shifts—including broader awareness of sexual violence and movements like #MeToo—have significantly altered the way sexual assault charges are laid and decided. Today, the complainant's testimony alone can, and often is, sufficient to support charges and even a conviction for sexual assault.
Even if the complainant recants their allegations or expresses a desire not to proceed, the Crown may choose to continue with the case. This is especially true where the allegations are serious in nature or corroborated by other forms of evidence, such as photographs, text messages, or witness testimony.
The absence of physical evidence does not mean an assault did not occur, and courts are increasingly sensitive to the reality that many victims may delay reporting or may not undergo a forensic examination at all. While forensic tools such as sexual assault evidence kits may be used to collect evidence of injuries, DNA, or other physical indicators of sexual activity, their use is not required.
"If the complainant wants to drop the charges the case will be withdrawn."
This is a common misunderstanding, and one which our we have explored extensively in the domestic assault context. In Ontario domestic assault cases, victims frequently swear affidavits or communicate directly with the Crown in order to get no contact orders lifted and domestic charges dropped.
Once a sexual assault charge has been laid, the matter becomes one for the Crown to pursue—it is no longer in the hands of the complainant. Even if the complainant recants their allegations or expresses a desire not to proceed, the Crown may choose to continue with the case. This is especially true where the allegations are serious in nature or corroborated by other forms of evidence, such as photographs, text messages, or witness testimony.
Given the nature of the allegations, the high stakes for clients and the central role thatcredibility assessments play in these cases, most sexual assault charges will proceed to trial in order to reach resolution.
The Crown has a legal obligation to assess whether there remains a reasonable prospect of conviction based on all the available evidence, and whether proceeding is in the public interest.
"If they didn't say 'no,' it wasn't a sexual assault."
This misconception reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how Canadian law defines consent. Consent is not simply the absence of a "no." Rather, it is the presence of a clear, voluntary, and ongoing "yes." The law requires that consent be affirmatively communicated—through words or conduct—by someone who has the capacity to give it.
Silence, passivity, or a failure to resist do not constitute consent. In fact, the Criminal Code expressly states that no consent is obtained where the complainant is incapable of consenting, submits out of fear, or where the accused abuses a position of trust, power, or authority. The focus in a courtroom is not on whether the complainant said "no," but whether they freely and affirmatively agreed to participate in the specific sexual act in question.
Common Defences to Sexual Assault Allegations in Ontario
Sexual assault cases are extremely serious and emotionally charged, and they often raise deeply conflicting versions of events. Given the nature of the allegations, the high stakes for clients and the central role that credibility assessments play in these cases, most sexual assault charges will proceed to trial in order to reach resolution. This reality is reinforced by Crown policy, which favours proceeding to trial where the complainant is willing to testify and the case meets the basic criteria for prosecution.
In Ontario, sexual assault trials can take anywhere from 12 to 24 months to reach, during which time the accused will work closely with their counsel to arrive at a clear and compelling response to the allegation. Despite the wish of every client to dispose of their sexual assault charge without going to trial, a trial is often the only venue where those competing claims can be tested thoroughly—through examination and cross-examination—over several days.
This section outlines some of the most common defences used in sexual assault cases in Ontario, and highlights how an experienced criminal lawyer for sexual assault cases can assess and advance these strategies.
Consent
One of the most frequently raised defences in sexual assault cases is that the complainant voluntarily agreed to engage in the sexual activity. A finding of consent does not require a single piece of decisive evidence; rather, it can arise from the broader context of the case where a doubt is raised about the complainant's willingness to engage in the sexual act in question.
Where there is evidence—whether from text messages, context, prior history, or the complainant's own conduct—that suggests ongoing or affirmative participation, the defence may argue that there is reasonable doubt as to whether the sexual activity was non-consensual.
At Shaffie Law, our approach to consent defences involves meticulous examination of all communications between the parties, careful analysis of relationship patterns, and thoughtful consideration of the context in which the sexual activity occurred. We understand that intimate relationships contain nuances that may not be immediately apparent to those outside the relationship.
Honest but Mistaken Belief in Consent
The criminal law does not punish those who are morally blameless. As a result, a person who honestly but mistakenly believed that the complainant was consenting may have a defence. However, that belief must be both honest and reasonable in the circumstances, and it must be based on the accused having taken reasonable steps to confirm consent.
The most effective sexual assault lawyers in Toronto bring both legal expertise and emotional intelligence to these cases, recognizing that relationship dynamics exist in shades of gray rather than black and white.
Courts have made clear that this belief cannot be rooted in myths or stereotypes—for example, assuming consent from passivity, silence, or lack of resistance. Instead, the belief must be grounded in something the complainant communicated, either verbally or non-verbally, through words, conduct, or physical cues that would suggest consent.
When examining this defence with our clients, our law firm explores not just what was said, but the entire context of the relationship. We recognize that communication between intimate partners often relies on subtle cues, established patterns, and non-verbal signals that develop over time.
Credibility and Reliability Challenges
Many sexual assault charges in Ontario turn on the word of the complainant versus the word of the accused. The defence may consist of an outright denial that any sexual contact occurred, or may focus on undermining the reliability or credibility of the complainant's account.
Where there are inconsistencies in the complainant's version of events, unexplained delays in reporting, or a motive to fabricate (such as ongoing family court proceedings or a financial incentive), the defence may argue that the Crown's case does not meet the standard of proof required. Courts are required to assess whether the Crown has proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt—not simply whether they believe the complainant over the accused.
Our firm approaches credibility challenges with clarity, precision and sensitivity. We understand that memory is complex and that inconsistencies don't necessarily indicate dishonesty. However, we also recognize our ethical obligation to test the Crown's evidence rigorously, particularly when our client's liberty is at stake. In cases involving intimate partners, we pay careful attention to potential motives to fabricate allegations. The end of relationships can create powerful emotions—resentment, jealousy, bitterness, or fear of loss—that may influence how events are recalled or reported. Custody disputes, financial conflicts, or desires for retribution following perceived betrayal can sometimes color allegations. Our defense strategy involves thoroughly examining the relationship context to ensure that such factors are properly considered by the court when assessing credibility.
Alibi or Identity-Based Defences
In some cases, the accused may argue that they were not present at the time of the alleged assault or that the complainant has mistaken them for someone else. These defences tend to arise less frequently in cases involving known parties but can be significant in stranger or online-related allegations.
The Importance of Hiring the Right Lawyer in Ontario Sexual Assault Cases
Sexual assault allegations necessarily cut to the core of one's reputation. Where intimate partners are involved, they also implicate rich and complex relationship dynamics going back years. An experienced sexual assault lawyer will not only assess the evidence and anticipate how the Crown is likely to present its case, they will take the time to understand the client's perspective, crafting a defence strategy that aligns with the reality of the parties' lived experiences.
Choosing the right law firm for your sexual assault defence is critical. Not every firm has the resources, commitment or imagination needed to fully explore the nuanced history between parties. When intimate relationships are involved, only dedicated defence counsel will invest the hours needed to uncover subtle patterns, contextualize communications, and identify inconsistencies that could prove decisive.
The most effective sexual assault lawyers in Toronto bring both legal expertise and emotional intelligence to these cases, recognizing that relationship dynamics exist in shades of gray rather than black and white. This level of commitment—to understanding not just the legal elements but the human story behind the allegations—can mean the difference between conviction and acquittal. At our firm, we believe that this depth of analysis and creative approach to defence strategy is not optional but essential to protecting our clients' futures.
Conclusion
Allegations of sexual assault are among the most serious charges a person can face in Ontario. These cases are emotionally complex, legally nuanced, and often hinge on fine distinctions in memory, communication, credibility and personal history For anyone accused, the process can feel overwhelming, especially in the face of social stigma and a lengthy criminal process that may take years to resolve.
Understanding your rights and the structure of a sexual assault prosecution is the first step toward building a strong defence. But more importantly, choosing the right legal representation can make all the difference. At Shaffie Law, we have extensive experience defending individuals facing sexual assault charges in Ontario, particularly in the context of intimate partner relationships. Our approach is thorough, strategic, and grounded in a deep understanding of how these cases unfold in real courtrooms.
If you or someone you care about has been charged with a sexual offence, contact Shaffie Law for a confidential consultation at 647-500-5186 or by writing to help@shaffielaw.ca. A skilled and experienced sexual assault lawyer in Ontario can help you understand your options, challenge the case against you, and protect your future.
Comments